Date: 2014-01-12 12:56 pm (UTC)
That's a great book, nothing like the words of the man himself, not intended for publication and really just to justify himself to The Mam. However much we might like to see out heroes as like ourselves, when you think about it, it's not that likely, and especially so at a hundred-plus year's distance.

We are "hard-wired" to notice difference and prefer the familiar, it's up to our conscious brain and social consensus to *decide* to embrace diversity rather than shun it. I see Doyle as, to the extent he could given all kinds of social pressures against it, sometimes trying to do that. He can be horribly classist and sexist as well, but as I say above, it would be very odd if he weren't.

I'm afraid I have little patience with the sort of prim 'keep my pure hands clean' attitude I have seen once or twice amongst those coming to the canon for the first time (usually from BBC Sherlock, which is hardly one to emulate in many respects in those areas) "oh, thank you for telling me it's racist, shudder, I won't read it now". Please learn some history, chummy, would be my response.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

sherlock60: (Default)
Sherlock Holmes: 60 for 60

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 19th, 2025 02:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios