ext_1620665: knight on horseback (0)
http://scfrankles.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] scfrankles.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] sherlock60 2016-01-03 12:44 pm (UTC)

Mr. Holmes is big on logic and reason but he's not entirely consistent in that regard ^_^

It's bizarre thinking about it now that a woman like Mrs. Hudson, supporting herself and owning her own property, wouldn't have had a vote because she was female. But did you know that when the Suffragists and Suffragettes were campaigning for votes for women in Britain, 40% of British men also didn't qualify to vote? Because they weren't wealthy enough. It just seems unbelievable now.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org