![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
Hello again! Time for some discussion about The Adventure of the Dying Detective! What did you think? Here are a few questions and thoughts to get you started -- add your own!
- How do you think Holmes got involved in the death of Victor Savage? Is it a formal case or a casual inquiry?
- "...if you love me!" -- Obviously he does, because he puts up with schemes like this one. We don't get to hear what Watson has to say to Holmes after this incident, but Watson has every right to be furious. Holmes frightens poor Mrs. Hudson into retrieving him, then Watson is forced to stand by and do nothing but watch Holmes grow weaker and sicker for two hours. And after everything he does, Holmes still forgets all about him hiding behind the bed at the end. Ouch. How does Watson forgive this? How does Mrs. Hudson forgive it? Does Holmes understand what he is doing here at all?
- DYIN is another story where it is easy to wonder if Watson is not always a reliable narrator. As he presents them here, the sequence of events seems highly unlikely, given what we know about Doctor Watson’s medical competence and his loyalty.
A conflict between what Watson says and what he does lingers. He tells Holmes very firmly, "If you think that I am going to stand here and see you die without either helping you myself or bringing anyone else to help you, then you have mistaken your man." But then he does just that, waiting around doing nothing for two hours. If Watson believes Holmes' scheme, really believes this man, his friend, is dying, why would he wait? Especially if he thinks Holmes may be delirious.
A couple caveats here. First, yes, he is respecting Holmes and his wishes to do as he asks, all very Victorian indeed, but Watson says himself that "a sick man is but a child". Does it make sense to bend to a child's arbitrary whims? This is a matter of life or death. Second, yes, the disease is said to be transmitted by touch. But clearly only through direct touch, because they both handle the key with no concerns. Couldn't Watson just put his leather gloves on? Third, yes, this means he would have to take the key by some amount of force, an outcome which Holmes is very sure Watson won't do. Should he be that sure, though? That might be Watson's predictable behavior under normal circumstances, but these are hardly normal circumstances.
- How do you think Holmes got involved in the death of Victor Savage? Is it a formal case or a casual inquiry?
- "...if you love me!" -- Obviously he does, because he puts up with schemes like this one. We don't get to hear what Watson has to say to Holmes after this incident, but Watson has every right to be furious. Holmes frightens poor Mrs. Hudson into retrieving him, then Watson is forced to stand by and do nothing but watch Holmes grow weaker and sicker for two hours. And after everything he does, Holmes still forgets all about him hiding behind the bed at the end. Ouch. How does Watson forgive this? How does Mrs. Hudson forgive it? Does Holmes understand what he is doing here at all?
- DYIN is another story where it is easy to wonder if Watson is not always a reliable narrator. As he presents them here, the sequence of events seems highly unlikely, given what we know about Doctor Watson’s medical competence and his loyalty.
A conflict between what Watson says and what he does lingers. He tells Holmes very firmly, "If you think that I am going to stand here and see you die without either helping you myself or bringing anyone else to help you, then you have mistaken your man." But then he does just that, waiting around doing nothing for two hours. If Watson believes Holmes' scheme, really believes this man, his friend, is dying, why would he wait? Especially if he thinks Holmes may be delirious.
A couple caveats here. First, yes, he is respecting Holmes and his wishes to do as he asks, all very Victorian indeed, but Watson says himself that "a sick man is but a child". Does it make sense to bend to a child's arbitrary whims? This is a matter of life or death. Second, yes, the disease is said to be transmitted by touch. But clearly only through direct touch, because they both handle the key with no concerns. Couldn't Watson just put his leather gloves on? Third, yes, this means he would have to take the key by some amount of force, an outcome which Holmes is very sure Watson won't do. Should he be that sure, though? That might be Watson's predictable behavior under normal circumstances, but these are hardly normal circumstances.