![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
Hey, everyone! Happy Sunday! Let's talk The Adventure of the Missing Three-Quarter. What did you think of it? As always, here are a few questions and thoughts of my own to get you started. Please add yours!
- Watson's recounting of his "weaning" Holmes off cocaine in this story stands out, especially in Watson's continual (and justified) fear the addiction will return at any moment. Do you think Holmes would have ever bothered to stop without Watson around him? Do you think he is glad he did?
- Why is everyone so immediately convinced of some kind of foul play in this case? Godfrey receives a note, is clearly deeply upset by it, and leaves immediately with an equally affected man. There isn't anything I can see in the porter's story to indicate crime and danger in his disappearance. Sure, the match is important, but did no one consider a personal or family emergency might take precedence for him?
- Both Holmes and Watson are terribly impressed with Dr. Leslie Armstrong. Holmes even goes so far as to compare him to Moriarty in terms of genius and ability! But does that actually seem warranted, given the man's decisions and behavior? Intelligent, certainly. But a worthy heir to Moriarty? Really?
- Dr. Armstrong gets it in his head that Holmes' client is Lord Mount-James and their cat and mouse game comes about entirely from that assumption. Should Holmes have corrected him? He may have been able to cut days off his investigation, although perhaps that's not really what he wanted. Even several days of futile searching is better than stultifying boredom. (And no cocaine to quell it...)
- Almost forgot to mention my favorite part: Holmes' delicious dry wit! "Neither dog nor man liked the look of my stick, however, and the matter fell through. Relations were strained after that." Ha!
- Watson's recounting of his "weaning" Holmes off cocaine in this story stands out, especially in Watson's continual (and justified) fear the addiction will return at any moment. Do you think Holmes would have ever bothered to stop without Watson around him? Do you think he is glad he did?
- Why is everyone so immediately convinced of some kind of foul play in this case? Godfrey receives a note, is clearly deeply upset by it, and leaves immediately with an equally affected man. There isn't anything I can see in the porter's story to indicate crime and danger in his disappearance. Sure, the match is important, but did no one consider a personal or family emergency might take precedence for him?
- Both Holmes and Watson are terribly impressed with Dr. Leslie Armstrong. Holmes even goes so far as to compare him to Moriarty in terms of genius and ability! But does that actually seem warranted, given the man's decisions and behavior? Intelligent, certainly. But a worthy heir to Moriarty? Really?
- Dr. Armstrong gets it in his head that Holmes' client is Lord Mount-James and their cat and mouse game comes about entirely from that assumption. Should Holmes have corrected him? He may have been able to cut days off his investigation, although perhaps that's not really what he wanted. Even several days of futile searching is better than stultifying boredom. (And no cocaine to quell it...)
- Almost forgot to mention my favorite part: Holmes' delicious dry wit! "Neither dog nor man liked the look of my stick, however, and the matter fell through. Relations were strained after that." Ha!