ext_1620665: knight on horseback (Default)
[identity profile] scfrankles.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] sherlock60
This week we’re having a look at The Creeping Man. I’ve typed up a few thoughts and questions to get the discussion going—please leave your own ideas in the comments!

...if only to dispel once for all the ugly rumours which some twenty years ago agitated the university and were echoed in the learned societies of London. Here Watson relates the true story that Presbury had taken a youth serum and was turning into a monkey. Any thoughts on what the rumours were? They must have been pretty terrible if turning into a monkey is less embarrassing. Last time we discussed CREE, [livejournal.com profile] laurose8 suggested perhaps there had been rumours Presbury had taken to drink, or had succumbed to madness. And if it was implied that this madness was hereditary, then Presbury’s daughter would probably want the truth to come out.

It was one Sunday evening early in September of the year 1903 that I received one of Holmes's laconic messages… If what Holmes tells us in BLAN is true (I find from my notebook that it was in January, 1903, just after the conclusion of the Boer War, that I had my visit from Mr. James M. Dodd…), then at this point Watson has “deserted [Holmes] for a wife.” In 3GAR, which is set “the latter end of June, 1902,” they are still together in Baker Street; in ILLU, which begins “September 3, 1902,” Watson is abruptly living in his “own rooms in Queen Anne Street”. But in CREE and in ILLU, there is absolutely no indication of a current or possible Mrs. Watson. Any thoughts?

The relations between us in those latter days were peculiar. There’s a melancholic feel to what Watson says at the start of the story but their friendship seems exactly the same to me. It certainly doesn't appear any more "peculiar" than it was at the beginning.

With a wave of his hand he indicated my old armchair, but otherwise for half an hour he gave no sign that he was aware of my presence. What is Watson doing for this half an hour? Does he have an emergency paperback on him?

“...you've heard of Presbury, of course, the famous Camford physiologist?” At the start of his narrative, Watson says: Mr. Sherlock Holmes was always of opinion that I should publish the singular facts connected with Professor Presbury, if only to dispel once for all the ugly rumours which some twenty years ago agitated the university and were echoed in the learned societies of London. And yet here we have a fake place name so readers can’t easily track down which university. Why this odd mixture of wanting to be open and ‘dispel rumours’, and being vague about the details of where Presbury taught?

“He is sixty-one years of age, but he became engaged to the daughter of Professor Morphy… The daughter, however, had other views, and there were already several candidates for her hand, who, if they were less eligible from a worldly point of view, were at least more of an age. The girl seemed to like the professor in spite of his eccentricities. It was only age which stood in the way.” This doesn’t quite make sense, as [livejournal.com profile] laurose8 also pointed out last time. Is Presbury already engaged or not? And if he’d already got engaged then why does he need to take a drug to make him seem younger and more appealing? Or did he first take the drug before getting engaged and now feels he can’t stop? Holmes does say: It was not, as I understand, the reasoned courting of an elderly man but rather the passionate frenzy of youth…”

“Oh, Jack, I have been so dreadfully frightened! It is awful to be there alone." Why does Miss Presbury call Trevor Bennett ‘Jack’? Or is this yet another double surname?

...involved frantic planning and hurrying on my part, as my practice was by this time not inconsiderable. So here it’s clearly stated that Watson has gone back to being a full-time doctor. Why? Has he indeed got married again—despite the complete lack of references to a wife?

"Mercer is since your time," said Holmes. "He is my general utility man who looks up routine business.” Any thoughts on Mercer?

“...that untimely love affair which gave our impetuous professor the idea that he could only gain his wish by turning himself into a younger man.” Does Presbury go on to marry Alice Morphy? I’m guessing no, for several reasons.

“Consider, Watson, that the material, the sensual, the worldly would all prolong their worthless lives. The spiritual would not avoid the call to something higher.” Intriguing. This does rather seem to imply that Holmes believes in some kind of afterlife.

Next Sunday, 31st January, we’ll be having a look at The Sussex Vampire. Hope you can join us then.

Date: 2016-01-24 01:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godsdaisiechain.livejournal.com
Thoughts: [warning that they are a bit ... whimsical]

Why is it better to now know what really happened? In Victorian England, people would just not understand the workings of science, but by the highly enlightened period of 1923, the public could hear about simian transformations in a much more critically distanced way. Especially once evolution was accepted.

Plus, the rumors had reached the stage where the professor had been transforming into a bat and ravishing young innocent women (or possibly cows) and thus being injected with monkey serum was, at the very least, exotic and science-y rather than simply weird and gross and well... cows?

Date: 2016-01-24 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thesmallhobbit.livejournal.com
Makes sense to me!

Date: 2016-01-24 02:57 pm (UTC)
ext_1789368: okapi (Default)
From: [identity profile] okapi1895.livejournal.com
This story made me wonder if the creation of Viagra (I cynically think all this talk of 'youthfulness' is just a synonym for male sexual potency) has in any way spared all the poor animals of the world (rhinos, tiger, whales, I think) from poaching them for their bits and pieces which get ground up and consumed (or grafted in the 1920s case) in the name of keeping spirits (and members) up.

On another flora and fauna note, I watched the Granada version of the story this week and Alice at one point tells the daughter to tell the father not to send her orchids anymore because they're 'impure somehow.' No coochie-looking flowers for her!

Date: 2016-01-24 04:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godsdaisiechain.livejournal.com
And here was me all ready with that chocolate cow again.

Date: 2016-01-24 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godsdaisiechain.livejournal.com
OMG. I am now seeing this whole story in a new light! Professor lacks potency. He needs monkeys to get the girl because a girl has needs, after all.

Date: 2016-01-24 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurose8.livejournal.com
This does seem very convincing.

As an addendum. Presbury seems to have been acting a bit strange before he even met Lowenstein, so maybe his monkeying around was merely self suggestion about how this strangeness should be expressed. (Which means there might be hereditary madness in the case after all.)

Date: 2016-01-24 05:45 pm (UTC)
ext_1789368: okapi (Default)
From: [identity profile] okapi1895.livejournal.com
Yeah, I hate to say it's all about erections, but in this case I think it really is. And the Granada folks must've thought so too because they were hitting the audience over the head with the 'you want thinly veiled sexual imagery' we'll give you 'thinly veiled sexual imagery'! At least they went for the yonic equivalent, a bit of goose for all the gander running around the episode.

Date: 2016-01-24 05:46 pm (UTC)
ext_1789368: okapi (Default)
From: [identity profile] okapi1895.livejournal.com
Could be a touch of that, too. He did take it to an extreme.

Date: 2016-01-24 05:46 pm (UTC)
ext_1789368: okapi (Default)
From: [identity profile] okapi1895.livejournal.com
Yup and yup. Not just the beans, the frank, too!

Date: 2016-01-24 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thesmallhobbit.livejournal.com
I thought I explained Watson's absence adequately the other week ;)

Frantic packing and hurrying is clearly a euphamism for something Watson and Lestrade needed to do. (without monkey glands too!)

Date: 2016-01-24 07:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godsdaisiechain.livejournal.com
In my semi serious mode, I do think that the passing of time (and/or death of the professor) might be the real cause.

Date: 2016-01-24 07:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godsdaisiechain.livejournal.com
But not the orchid, as it were.

Date: 2016-01-24 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godsdaisiechain.livejournal.com
I am still very confused, though, about the explanation... and the euphemism. Whatever could they be doing?

Date: 2016-01-24 07:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thesmallhobbit.livejournal.com
Watson is not at 221B, because he is currently living with Inspector Lestrade. Of course, he cannot admit to this, so the idea of a wife is left in the air, where a casual reader will assume Watson is married and think no more about it. Unfortunately, Watson can never decide how best to avoid describing his residence and floats between living at 221B and being married.

They were 'practising'.

Date: 2016-01-24 08:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godsdaisiechain.livejournal.com
It must be more convenient, what with living together and all...

Profile

sherlock60: (Default)
Sherlock Holmes: 60 for 60

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 5th, 2026 06:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios