Date: 2016-05-29 06:22 pm (UTC)
Mnay thanks to you and [livejournal.com profile] garonne for so much info, and so many links. (Only 4%?)

I was going to draw attention to the curious actions of Janet Tregellis, but it occurred to me that she might indeed have been apparent. Watson would have had a scene with a beauty in distress, but Holmes might have felt it added nothing to the case.

Nonetheless, it is possible that the reason no one found Brunton's scarf was that either girl told a search party there was nothing in that cellar, and his treasure hunting with Rachel would certainly make Janet feel she'd been ditched in her turn.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

sherlock60: (Default)
Sherlock Holmes: 60 for 60

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 24th, 2025 04:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios