Discussion Post: The Sussex Vampire
Jun. 9th, 2012 11:35 pmIt's Sunday, so let's talk canon, shall we? What did you think of The Sussex Vampire? It may not be supernatural, but it certainly is unsettling. As always, I've written up a few of my random thoughts and questions about the story. Please add your own!
- I liked the telling way each character reacts to the possibility of the supernatural. Holmes simply dismisses the notion out of hand, Watson tries to explain the bizarre circumstances medically, and their client Robert Ferguson simply does not know what to believe -- he leaves that job to the professionals.
- Why is it that the later these stories were written, the more Watson says Holmes rarely or never laughs? Here we get from him a "dry chuckle which was his nearest approach to a laugh." But in Study in Scarlet, their first case together, Watson specifically mentioned Holmes' laugh ("merry" or "explosive") a number of times. So, any theories? Is it a misrepresentation? Which is the truth? Or did Holmes become more reserved about his mirth as he aged?
- Enter... the giant rat of Sumatra! Or hints about it, anyway. It's too bad the world will now never be prepared to hear that story. It must be a doozy.
- Speaking of hearing stories, we get another glimpse of what's in Holmes' index. What wouldn't I give to get my hands on that book! With forgers, circus acts, snakes, and monsters (both gila and undead) listed in just the portion of the letter V's entries Holmes gives us, what might the rest be filled with?
- I have to say, few characters in these canon cases are creepier than Jack here. His relationship to his father is... disturbing. Is a year at sea any kind of punishment or rehabilitation for Jack for attempted fratricide? It seems ridiculous as a suggestion from Holmes. With Jack's disability, is that even possible? Why would Holmes suggest it as a solution? What really happened with Jack after this?
- I liked the telling way each character reacts to the possibility of the supernatural. Holmes simply dismisses the notion out of hand, Watson tries to explain the bizarre circumstances medically, and their client Robert Ferguson simply does not know what to believe -- he leaves that job to the professionals.
- Why is it that the later these stories were written, the more Watson says Holmes rarely or never laughs? Here we get from him a "dry chuckle which was his nearest approach to a laugh." But in Study in Scarlet, their first case together, Watson specifically mentioned Holmes' laugh ("merry" or "explosive") a number of times. So, any theories? Is it a misrepresentation? Which is the truth? Or did Holmes become more reserved about his mirth as he aged?
- Enter... the giant rat of Sumatra! Or hints about it, anyway. It's too bad the world will now never be prepared to hear that story. It must be a doozy.
- Speaking of hearing stories, we get another glimpse of what's in Holmes' index. What wouldn't I give to get my hands on that book! With forgers, circus acts, snakes, and monsters (both gila and undead) listed in just the portion of the letter V's entries Holmes gives us, what might the rest be filled with?
- I have to say, few characters in these canon cases are creepier than Jack here. His relationship to his father is... disturbing. Is a year at sea any kind of punishment or rehabilitation for Jack for attempted fratricide? It seems ridiculous as a suggestion from Holmes. With Jack's disability, is that even possible? Why would Holmes suggest it as a solution? What really happened with Jack after this?
no subject
Date: 2012-06-10 07:45 am (UTC)Then again, maybe a year at sea suggests something entirely different...
Good point about the Holmes chuckle - perhaps that was Doyle being influenced by the actors now playing Holmes? Just a guess - i hadn't caught that change before.
Anyhow, i like this story very much, although it is far too short, everyone (and the author) in very fine fettle. The introduction is even funnier given that ACD is playing on his own reputation for being overly gullible when dealing with matters supernatural.
The story itself as you say is creepy and unsettling - and the genuine distress of the family is communicated well.
It also speaks volumes for Holmes' ambiguous feelings re; women, that he never seriously suspects the mother. Is this too a subtle retcon? If so, it is not one i object to. Holmes shows similar sympathies in Thor Bridge.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-10 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-10 05:27 pm (UTC)And it's also really hard to answer given Holmes reticence as well as Watson clouding the issue with his Victorian romanticism. I also think that Holmes has a more 'continental' view of law and women, taking a passionate nature for granted. I suppose such a view could be open to criticism.
Ach, I don't know.
My opinion (ie my instinct) is the same as yours that for Holmes the issue is a non-issue.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-10 07:52 am (UTC)He wouldn't have been able to enlist in the navy, certainly, but a position as cabin boy aboard a merchant ship might have been arranged.
Victorian (and specifically Doyle's, as he took the view that spending time at sea himself at 21 - on a Greenland Whaler - "made a man of him") views of how to get people to improve themselves could be a litle strange...Jacky would be off to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services quick-sticks nowadays.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-10 08:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-10 02:25 pm (UTC)Sunday, June 10, 2012 and Monday, June 11, 2012
Date: 2012-06-12 04:49 am (UTC)