The ballots are in from the poll, and overwhelmingly you said you'd like to keep going here at
sherlock60 for another go through the canon. I'm thrilled -- let's do it!
Now the first question is, should we change the order we read in for the next time around?
methylviolet10b and I went with alphabetical order to mix things up a bit rather than reading them in the usual publication order. But several people have expressed interest in a chronological order, and that sounds very appealing to me as well. The disadvantage with that change, though, is that writers wanting to catch up with the stories they missed from the beginning of our first run won't be able to do that without waiting or posting catch-ups.
Also, if we go to a chronological order, we have a few choices because the history of Sherlock Holmes is only interpreted, and interpretations vary. One that has been around since the fifties and frequently used is the Baring-Gould chronology. We could also pick a newer analysis from one of the internet Sherlockian groups, such as this one suggested by
bwblack.
Once we've decided on an order, should we add anything else? Several of you expressed interest in having optional extra challenges, such as a theme or format or point of view. That sounds interesting too -- how would you want to work that? Should I spin a wheel every week or something? Whatever we choose, I definitely want to keep it optional, because more than anything we want more canon fic in whatever manner it comes.
Do you like these ideas? Favor something else? Please leave a comment with your thoughts and opinions! We'll try to come to a bit of a consensus and next week, I'll post the instructions for our next go-round. Thank you so much for your help, everyone! Let's go for another terrific 60 weeks of Sherlock Holmes canon fiction!
Edited to add: Oh, almost forgot!
flawedamythyst,
tweedisgood and I are going to be watching the Granada episodes (available on YouTube and Netflix) along with the 60 schedule and discussing them, which will be terrific fun. For my money, Jeremy Brett is the finest Holmes of all time, paired with two of the best Watsons. We hope you will join us for that as well!
Now the first question is, should we change the order we read in for the next time around?
Also, if we go to a chronological order, we have a few choices because the history of Sherlock Holmes is only interpreted, and interpretations vary. One that has been around since the fifties and frequently used is the Baring-Gould chronology. We could also pick a newer analysis from one of the internet Sherlockian groups, such as this one suggested by
Once we've decided on an order, should we add anything else? Several of you expressed interest in having optional extra challenges, such as a theme or format or point of view. That sounds interesting too -- how would you want to work that? Should I spin a wheel every week or something? Whatever we choose, I definitely want to keep it optional, because more than anything we want more canon fic in whatever manner it comes.
Do you like these ideas? Favor something else? Please leave a comment with your thoughts and opinions! We'll try to come to a bit of a consensus and next week, I'll post the instructions for our next go-round. Thank you so much for your help, everyone! Let's go for another terrific 60 weeks of Sherlock Holmes canon fiction!
Edited to add: Oh, almost forgot!
no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 09:37 am (UTC)*ahem*
I'm definitely in for another round. I wrote all 60 despite having joined so late, but I don't feel like a round of catchups, I'd definitely prefer the production of something new.
As for the theme challenge, I'm definitely supporting optional. Not quite sure what I'm going for this time (last round was all-Sherlock POV), I'd love to add an OC of mine, but have no idea if that would work out on such a small scale.
Otherwise, there might be a set of tropes or a genre to choose (from).
no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 09:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 09:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 11:21 am (UTC)lots of love,
Watson.
P.S. xxx
Looking forward to the viewing club. ETA delete all refs to eps as I have no idea about chronology, oops.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 03:23 pm (UTC)I don't care if there's an additional challenge, although it would be nice if it were optional. Maybe depending on how many challenges you come up with, either draw them out of a hat, or just have them on a rotating basis so we know what to expect?
no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 04:10 pm (UTC)Your hard work in sorting this all out is greatly appreciated:-)
no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 06:50 pm (UTC):D
no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-05 11:15 pm (UTC)Great work and a big thanks to all the moderators of this blog!
no subject
Date: 2012-08-06 05:25 am (UTC)As for the order, chronological seems like the 'logical' next step to me, too. And I'd love to hear more about the watchalongs for Granada. I've been DVRing them as they play on my local PBS station when I can, and I have a lot of catching up to do!
Now don't forget to take a well-deserved bow, my dear. You so deserve it!
no subject
Date: 2012-08-06 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-06 06:21 pm (UTC)It doesn't link with any particular order, though SCAN comes first and that is the first of the short stories.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-06 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-07 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-07 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-07 07:04 pm (UTC)It also helps that I have the rare luxury of sleeping in whenever I like.
<3
no subject
Date: 2012-08-07 07:19 pm (UTC)For me, it seems like going in the same chronological order as the 60s would make the most sense. Yes, we'll be skipping around with Watsons and Jeremy Brett's health, but that's interesting in its own way to my eyes. (And probably less depressing, because we won't have to watch JB gradually die.)
I realize this is the outlier opinion. I want us all to be happy with the decision, but I also want as many people to join us as possible. Hmmm.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-07 07:48 pm (UTC)We're definitely going in chronological order, probably the more traditional order. It's worth looking into to see the differences -- people put a lot of work into thinking these puzzles out!
And, yes, any additional challenge will be fully optional, so don't worry about that. Thanks for your help, and again, welcome!
no subject
Date: 2012-08-07 08:17 pm (UTC)Thanks for coming along with us and thanks for the support!
no subject
Date: 2012-08-07 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-07 08:19 pm (UTC)(And here's hoping RL eases off you a bit to allow for some more fic!)
no subject
Date: 2012-08-08 01:17 am (UTC)And thank you kindly! It's so much fun to have such a great group of writers along on our slightly mad adventure. :)
no subject
Date: 2012-08-08 01:22 am (UTC)I'm delighted so many people enjoy this project with us. I wasn't sure what to expect when we started, but look at how many people post and read! Look how excited everyone is about another go-round! It's just awesome. We have such a great community here.
Thanks for everything. This has been a delight, and I would never have done it without you.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-08 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-08 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-08 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-08 04:15 pm (UTC)