[identity profile] azriona.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] sherlock60
Canon Story: The Five Orange Pips
Title: Triptych
Author: [livejournal.com profile] azriona
Rating: G
Warnings: none
Author's Notes: The theory about the Baring-Gould chronology, if I understand correctly, is that Watson was deliberately skewering with the timelines in an effort to mask that fact that he was married several times; instead, he wanted the public to think he was married only the once, to Mary Morstan. (Was marrying that many times really so much of an issue in a time when dying in childbirth or of illness was more common? Or maybe Watson was killing off his wives one by one and didn’t want anyone to catch on? Hmm, there’s a plot bunny for you; feel free to run with that, anyone.) Anyway, I was all sorts of grumbly about the out-of-order dates of events, so I wrote this triptych of 60s. I blame [livejournal.com profile] spacemutineer, since she’s the one who explained the theory behind the chronology. :)



1.

He changes years, makes false references, all for the sake of my “delicate” nature.

"My wife, my one love," he says. I smile, kiss his brow. He thinks I believe him.

I do not mind his previous marriages. My John loves me now.

But I wonder. When I die, will he forget me as readily as he has forgotten them?


2.

She smiles sadly when I say "wife.” I do not doubt her love; rather she must doubt mine, so freely given in the past.

A little slight of hand, masking of the true order of events, so that she can face the world as my one beloved wife, is not too much, if it brings her a scrap of comfort.


3.

Of course I know why he is lax with his dates, why events are referenced out of order, despite his careful note-taking. She knows, too, lets him play the charade. It does not harm either of them.

My friend is blind to so much, in her, in me, but none so much as what he is blind to within himself.

Date: 2012-11-03 02:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thesmallhobbit.livejournal.com
These are great interpretations of the problem.

Although I do agree that marrying more than once must have been both common and accepted when the mortality rate was much higher.

Date: 2012-11-03 09:25 pm (UTC)
debriswoman: (cat and mouse)
From: [personal profile] debriswoman
I like this; a thoughtful interpretation of date discrepancies. And quite wistful.

Well done:-)

Date: 2012-11-04 07:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ennui-enigma.livejournal.com
Nicely written! Enjoyed them all. The last one strikes me as rather sad. "none so much as what he is blind to within himself". A reminder that sometimes people purposely choose their blind spots, unfortunately.

Date: 2012-11-04 08:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hisietari.livejournal.com
The multiple perspectives are great, I like the insight one gets from comparing all three. It's fantastic how you managed to make clear who speaks/thinks here without a single name, and on so small a space.

Profile

sherlock60: (Default)
Sherlock Holmes: 60 for 60

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 04:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios