Discussion Post: A Case of Identity
Dec. 4th, 2011 12:23 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
Hello again, all! How did you find A Case of Identity? As always, here are a few thoughts and questions to get things rolling. Please add your own and discuss away!
- Quite a comedown from the terrific Hound of the Baskervilles to this. Can't say this was one of my favorites, personally. Between the extremely obvious case (oh, look, stepfather's conveniently in France again! Time to get married!), the absurdly dense client, and the deplorable Victorian gender politics, IDEN frustrates me. What did you all think?
- We have to address the ending of this case and Holmes' reasoning for doing what he chooses to do. Despite him telling James Windibank that "there never was a man who deserved punishment more", Holmes still allows him (and the girl's mother!) to continue taking advantage of Mary Sutherland. The easiest way for the stepfather to be punished is to tell the truth to the daughter. The law might not be able to touch Windibank, but armed with knowledge, Mary could, by leaving his house and taking her money with her. Yet Holmes keeps what he knows to himself, damning this woman to years of continued exploitation and hopeless pining for a man who never even existed. Even if Mary is "vacuous" and "vulgar" (as Watson says), doesn't she deserve better, both as a client and as a human being?
- Let's end on a high note: Don't you just love the romantic (in all senses of the word) notion of Holmes and Watson soaring over London, hand-in-hand, exploring the curiosities and wonder of the city and the humanity of her residents? It's voyeuristic, to be sure, but both of them are keen and incisive observers of mankind already. It is simply taking that concept one leap forward -- and out the window.
- Quite a comedown from the terrific Hound of the Baskervilles to this. Can't say this was one of my favorites, personally. Between the extremely obvious case (oh, look, stepfather's conveniently in France again! Time to get married!), the absurdly dense client, and the deplorable Victorian gender politics, IDEN frustrates me. What did you all think?
- We have to address the ending of this case and Holmes' reasoning for doing what he chooses to do. Despite him telling James Windibank that "there never was a man who deserved punishment more", Holmes still allows him (and the girl's mother!) to continue taking advantage of Mary Sutherland. The easiest way for the stepfather to be punished is to tell the truth to the daughter. The law might not be able to touch Windibank, but armed with knowledge, Mary could, by leaving his house and taking her money with her. Yet Holmes keeps what he knows to himself, damning this woman to years of continued exploitation and hopeless pining for a man who never even existed. Even if Mary is "vacuous" and "vulgar" (as Watson says), doesn't she deserve better, both as a client and as a human being?
- Let's end on a high note: Don't you just love the romantic (in all senses of the word) notion of Holmes and Watson soaring over London, hand-in-hand, exploring the curiosities and wonder of the city and the humanity of her residents? It's voyeuristic, to be sure, but both of them are keen and incisive observers of mankind already. It is simply taking that concept one leap forward -- and out the window.