Discussion Post: The Musgrave Ritual
Jan. 22nd, 2012 12:58 amWelcome back and hello! After a little bit of a slow patch, we have a classic here with The Musgrave Ritual. What did you think? As always, here are some of my thoughts and questions about it. Please add your own!
- Now this is a good one! The Musgrave Ritual is a canon high note. With both an interesting case, Holmes history and fun Holmes and Watson interaction in 221B, MUSG has it all.
- Lots of Sherlock Holmes and Baker Street goodness here. The Persian slipper! The letters jack-knifed to the fireplace! The VR shot into the wall! The experiments everywhere! In fact, there's so much goodness, it's almost overwhelming. Maybe it's just coming off a few lesser stories in a row, but I would almost prefer the (delicious, wonderful) character bits be spread out more across the stories in a way. Probably just me on that one.
- Watson is "more lax than befits a medical man", but even he has his limits. I love that only Watson has the power to make Holmes concede an argument to clean, but at the same time, Holmes finds a way out of it, telling this story instead. And the best part is that Watson was excited for it. Their friendship adds so much to these stories.
- As for the case itself, there's one big question: Did Rachel kill Brunton intentionally or was his death an accident? Even Holmes isn't completely sure. What do you think?
- Now this is a good one! The Musgrave Ritual is a canon high note. With both an interesting case, Holmes history and fun Holmes and Watson interaction in 221B, MUSG has it all.
- Lots of Sherlock Holmes and Baker Street goodness here. The Persian slipper! The letters jack-knifed to the fireplace! The VR shot into the wall! The experiments everywhere! In fact, there's so much goodness, it's almost overwhelming. Maybe it's just coming off a few lesser stories in a row, but I would almost prefer the (delicious, wonderful) character bits be spread out more across the stories in a way. Probably just me on that one.
- Watson is "more lax than befits a medical man", but even he has his limits. I love that only Watson has the power to make Holmes concede an argument to clean, but at the same time, Holmes finds a way out of it, telling this story instead. And the best part is that Watson was excited for it. Their friendship adds so much to these stories.
- As for the case itself, there's one big question: Did Rachel kill Brunton intentionally or was his death an accident? Even Holmes isn't completely sure. What do you think?
no subject
Date: 2012-01-22 09:10 am (UTC)when it covers to the motivations and actions of women... hardly his strong suit!
i remember reading a pretty good sequel story to this 'The Addington Treasure'? i think.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-23 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-23 09:59 pm (UTC)http://www.amazon.com/Book-New-Sherlock-Holmes-Adventures/dp/0785818804
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Mammoth-Sherlock-Holmes-Adventures-Books/dp/1845299264/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1327355393&sr=8-1
no subject
Date: 2012-01-22 12:50 pm (UTC)The fact that Rachel didn't go for help tends to point towards deliberately killing Brunton, but equally the shock of an accident could have prevented her from acting logically, after all she was a highly strung Welsh girl!
no subject
Date: 2012-01-23 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-22 10:55 pm (UTC)I was curious about the oak and the elm. Even granting that the trees were already mature at the time the crown was hidden (and those who hid it meant for it to be retrieved fairly soon thereafter), would they not have grown taller in the interim, and at different rates? At least enough to throw off Holmes' and Brunton's calculations....
no subject
Date: 2012-01-23 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-23 08:53 pm (UTC)