Discussion Post: Wisteria Lodge
Aug. 5th, 2012 12:19 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
Okay, let's get down to some canon business, shall we? What did you all think of Wisteria Lodge? It has quite a bit going on in it, making it feel almost like elements of several different cases thrown in a blender. As always, I've written up a few of my thoughts and questions about the case. Please add your own!
- Holmes laments the lack of "audacity and romance" in the criminal class, and the phasing stuck out to me. What a perfect way to describe why I love stories about Sherlock Holmes: the audacity and the romance, in all their forms.
- There is a temporal paradox here. Watson claims very clearly that this occurred in March of 1892. But Sherlock Holmes wasn't technically alive in 1892. So what causes the discrepancy? A mistake? Holmes does mention Carruthers, which would place it later, after the Solitary Cyclist. Maybe it could be a cover? One fun theory says that Watson was attempting this investigation alone, after Holmes' death and wrote him into it later. Holmes doesn't really do much here -- Baynes does most of the real detecting and action. He's always one step ahead, one of the only police investigators to get the jump on Sherlock Holmes. Any other ideas? Which do you like?
- This one may be just me, but my slash goggles were on full blast with the people involved in the case. There's Henderson, who lived inseparably with his "close and confidential friend" Lucas, and his (their?) two daughters. And then there's Eccles, who met "as good-looking a man as ever I saw in my life" in Garcia. Immediately, Garcia "took a fancy" to him, "one thing led to another" and before you knew it, Eccles was in Garcia's bed for the weekend. Oh, slash goggles, you're getting me into trouble again...
- What about Henderson's little girls, by the way? What happens to them now?
- At the end, Holmes tells Watson that "it will not be possible for you to present" the tale of Wisteria Lodge to readers. He must have taken that as a challenge. (Oooh, sudden thought -- maybe he's telling him it's impossible -- because it's impossible for Holmes to have been there at all! Oh, I like that one!)
- Holmes laments the lack of "audacity and romance" in the criminal class, and the phasing stuck out to me. What a perfect way to describe why I love stories about Sherlock Holmes: the audacity and the romance, in all their forms.
- There is a temporal paradox here. Watson claims very clearly that this occurred in March of 1892. But Sherlock Holmes wasn't technically alive in 1892. So what causes the discrepancy? A mistake? Holmes does mention Carruthers, which would place it later, after the Solitary Cyclist. Maybe it could be a cover? One fun theory says that Watson was attempting this investigation alone, after Holmes' death and wrote him into it later. Holmes doesn't really do much here -- Baynes does most of the real detecting and action. He's always one step ahead, one of the only police investigators to get the jump on Sherlock Holmes. Any other ideas? Which do you like?
- This one may be just me, but my slash goggles were on full blast with the people involved in the case. There's Henderson, who lived inseparably with his "close and confidential friend" Lucas, and his (their?) two daughters. And then there's Eccles, who met "as good-looking a man as ever I saw in my life" in Garcia. Immediately, Garcia "took a fancy" to him, "one thing led to another" and before you knew it, Eccles was in Garcia's bed for the weekend. Oh, slash goggles, you're getting me into trouble again...
- What about Henderson's little girls, by the way? What happens to them now?
- At the end, Holmes tells Watson that "it will not be possible for you to present" the tale of Wisteria Lodge to readers. He must have taken that as a challenge. (Oooh, sudden thought -- maybe he's telling him it's impossible -- because it's impossible for Holmes to have been there at all! Oh, I like that one!)